Which critique of laboratory research on emotional event memory relates to generalizability?

The critique that relates specifically to generalizability is that memories in real life differ significantly from lab-generated experiences. This is crucial because generalizability refers to the extent to which findings from a study can be applied to broader, real-world contexts. Laboratory research often employs controlled environments and specific stimuli, which may not capture the complexity and variability of real-life emotional events. As a result, the emotional memories formed under laboratory conditions might not reflect how individuals actually remember emotionally charged experiences in their everyday lives. This disparity raises questions about whether the insights gained from laboratory studies can be confidently applied to understand memory in more naturalistic settings.